Mcp Servers · Head to head
Convertlyft vs Kite
Both are listed under Mcp Servers. Convertlyft is free plan, paid upgrades; Kite is free plan, paid upgrades. Their listed features do not overlap, so the choice comes down to what you need done.
Free plan, paid upgrades
Read-only MCP to find why visitors don't buy and what to change
Free plan, paid upgrades
Agent-first design tool: humans and agents edit one HTML/CSS file.
At a glance
| Convertlyft | Kite | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan, paid upgrades | Free plan, paid upgrades |
| Free to start | Yes | Yes |
| Category | Mcp Servers | Mcp Servers |
| Features listed | 6 | 4 |
Features compared
Only Convertlyft
- Read-only funnel analysis
- Read-only session replay analysis
- Read-only heatmap analysis
- Error and page speed data
- SEO data
- Ranked conversion fixes
Only Kite
- Agent-native via MCP: a hosted remote MCP server with 61 tools to read, draw, edit and check designs. Agents connect with OAuth, no API key needed.
- Design system read before every draw: variables (with light/dark modes), components with variants, and plain-language “skills” (brand rules and guardrails). Agents place component copies instead of redrawing them.
- Code and interop: copy any frame as HTML, React or Tailwind. Paste to and from Figma as editable layers. Kite Capture for Chrome turns any web page into editable layers. Export to PNG, WebP, SVG and PDF.
- Collaboration: live multiplayer cursors for humans and agents, version history, shared libraries across files, and link-based sharing with comment-only viewers.
Strengths and drawbacks
Convertlyft
Kite
- + Cost model: no AI credit markup. You use the Claude or ChatGPT plan you already pay for, which suits a low-cost workflow.
- + Design = HTML/CSS: the gap between what the agent writes and what you see is smaller than in Figma, so handoff to code should be cleaner.
- + Design-system enforcement: variables, components and skills should reduce the generic “AI look” and keep output on-brand.
- + Open agent ecosystem: any MCP client works, so you aren’t locked to one model vendor.
- − Marketing page only: nothing here proves output quality. How well agents handle complex layouts, responsive behavior or large design systems is untested.
- − Young product: expect gaps against Figma’s maturity in plugins, prototyping, dev-mode handoff, enterprise controls and community resources.
- − Prototyping and animation: the page doesn’t mention interactive prototyping, which Figma has.
Which one to pick
Choose Convertlyft if
- You need read-only funnel analysis.
- You need read-only session replay analysis.
- You need read-only heatmap analysis.
Choose Kite if
- You need agent-native via MCP: a hosted remote MCP server with 61 tools to read, draw, edit and check designs. Agents connect with OAuth, no API key needed..
- You need design system read before every draw: variables (with light/dark modes), components with variants, and plain-language “skills” (brand rules and guardrails). Agents place component copies instead of redrawing them..
- You need code and interop: copy any frame as HTML, React or Tailwind. Paste to and from Figma as editable layers. Kite Capture for Chrome turns any web page into editable layers. Export to PNG, WebP, SVG and PDF..
About each tool
Convertlyft
Convertlyft is a hosted, read-only MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. It combines funnels, session replays, heatmaps, errors, page speed and SEO data to produce ranked fixes that improve conversions. It cannot edit your website and is not an autonomous AI. Free up to 5000 visits/month, no card; paid plans…
Kite
Kite is an agent-first design tool where humans and AI agents work on the same HTML/CSS file. It has components and variants, variable modes, Figma paste both ways, and a hosted MCP server at https://kite.new/api/mcp so any agent can read and edit the canvas.